spaces

Deleting Stuff

by Heather on July 24, 2009

Proofreaders’ Marks

Unwanted letters, words, and punctuation can seem to crop up out of nowhere when I’m writing. Sometimes it’s just that I’ve realized I don’t really need that sentence or word, and sometimes it’s my errant fingers typing things without permission. You know, like when you arrive somewhere but can’t remember the drive.

In any case, it’s often necessary to strike a letter, word, or sentence from our writing, and we do that with the deletion mark:


The curly bit on the end is important—it’s what keeps these marks from being mistaken for other proofreading marks. So, all you need to do is cross out your word with a flourish and your done, right?

Well, actually you’re probably not done, and that’s because when we delete letters  we usually want to delete the spaces they were occupying, too. (Remember my Marking Spaces post and how spaces are as real as ink on the printed page?) If you remove the word thing from a document you probably don’t want to leave behind the 5 extra spaces. So here’s how you can combine your curly deletion symbol from above with the close-it-up symbol (which looks like sideways parentheses):


And here’s how the delete and close-it-up symbol looks when it’s in action:

That red pencil still burning a hole in your pocket protector? You can find a full listing of all the Word Blog’s Proofreaders’ Marks entries here.

3 comments

One Space or Two?

by Heather on June 8, 2009

Formatting, Ink

Since we’re on the topic of spaces, I thought I’d write a quick entry about spaces between sentences. A lot of us were taught to include two spaces after each sentence in typing class, and many of us were taught not to. Who’s right?

Short Answer:

One space is the current standard for spacing between sentences in English. (See CMS 6.11)

Long Fun Answer:

Well, spacing depends on what century it is and how you’re disseminating your words. In the early days of the printed word, type was set by compositors who set both characters and spaces. Since the earliest compositors were in the business of making printed text look as much like written text as possible, they added the same kinds of space between sentences as did the scribes:

Moveable Type in a Composing Stick

Moveable Type in a Composing Stick

Compositors carried on with this convention for hundreds of years. They found, just as the scribes had before them, that it makes the reader’s job much easier.

Then in the nineteenth century the mechanical typewriter became a practical alternative for writers wanting to create their own printed documents for business and personal use. The nature of the typewriter’s mechanics meant that the type on the page was monospaced (an i taking up as much space on the page as an m for instance).

Proportional and Monospaced Type

Proportional and Monospaced Type

This meant that a period and the space following it would also take up the same amount of space in monospaced type. This is why those of us who learned to type on typewriters were taught to insert two spaces at the end of a sentence, creating a facsimile of that natural spacing scribes and compositors had always included between sentences.

Here’s a typewritten page of Jack Keroac’s work that demonstrates very well how much more difficult monospaced type can be to read. His double spaces are welcome islands in a sea of dense type:

But since you’re looking at a computer right now, you know that typewriters and their monospaced type have slipped into relative obscurity. To be sure, every computer that rolls off an assembly line today comes with Courier (the love-hate monospaced font) but by far most fonts in use today are proportional ones.

These fonts and their visually pleasing proportionality make the second space superfluous: the spaces between sentences would no longer be at risk of being mistaken for the spaces within monospaced words.

And that’s one condensed account of the surprisingly complex story of how the single space came back into vogue.

For more great information about this topic visit these resources online:

Trick of the Trade: If you want to change your documents so that they use the single space instead of the double, you needn’t change them all manually (what a dreadful lot of work that would be). You can use Word’s find and replace function to do it for you: simply type two spaces into the Find field, and type one space into the Replace field. Voilà !

Try This at Home: This trick works with most word processing and page-layout and design softwares, but save your work before you start just in case, okay?)

Don’t Try This at Home: This trick works in only one direction, so please don’t try to replace your single spaces with double ones using this method. If you do you’ll end up with double spaces between words within your sentences and in all kinds of other inconvenient spots.

Be the first to comment

Marking Spaces

by Heather on June 5, 2009

Proofreaders’ Marks

Writers and editors aren’t only concerned with the ink on the page, but also with the spaces separating the ink. But how can you have a mark that denotes a lack of mark, a space? Well, you can arbitrarily assign that task to a mark that rarely appears in documents:

How to know exactly where this lovely space is supposed to go? A caret like this one is used to show just where this new space is needed:

You’ll be seeing a lot of these carets in the Proofreaders Marks entries because they’re so handy for inserting all kinds of characters. But perhaps you’re wondering how to fit these marks into a document where a space is missing—after all if there’s no space there’s no space, right? That’s where the skinny caret comes in. It’s a natural outgrowth of the caret that allows a lot of precision when editing in tight spaces:

You’ll be seeing a lot of these in these entries, too.

And here’s an example of an inserted space mark in action:

That red pencil still burning a hole in your pocket protector? You can find a full listing of all the Word Blog’s Proofreaders’ Marks entries here.

Be the first to comment